<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vose, J.M.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Using fire to restore pine/hardwood ecosystems in the southern Appalachians of North Carolina.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Proceedings - Fire Effects on Rare and Endangered Species and Habitats Conference</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">CWT</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1997</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://cwt33.ecology.uga.edu/publications/2063.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Our objective is to compare the effectiveness of the fell and burn method with stand replacement techniques for restoring pine/hardwood ecosystems in the southern Appalachians of North Carolina. This is accomplished by comparing pine regeneration and overstory composition among an unburned reference site, a 13-yr-old fell and burn site, a 25-yr-old wildfire site, and a stand replacement fire site. We also briefly compare the effects of burning on aboveground nitrogen (N) pools.</style></abstract><accession-num><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LTER.1997-80634</style></accession-num></record></records></xml>