<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Douglass, J.E.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Silviculture for Water Yield</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">No citation</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">CWT</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1980</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://cwt33.ecology.uga.edu/publications/2139.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">In an article on the folklore and bromides in watershed management, Sartz (1969) recounted many popular misconceptions, but he omitted perhaps the greatest of them all--the belief that forests cannot be managed to improve water yield.   When I first heard this view expressed, I assumed the speaker was &quot;pulling my leg.&quot; However, through the years,  I have come to realize that these opinions were sincere; many foresters, engineers, and, yes, even some hydrologists still believe that management of the forest for improved water yield is not practical, despite 40 years of evidence to the contrary.   In fact, my own research has been referenced to conclude that no measurable increases in yield can be expected from typical modes of multiple-benefit management (Boyce 1977).   The reference was to the conclusion that a certain percentage of the basal  area of a watershed must be cut to produce an increase in flow large enough to be statistically significant.</style></abstract><accession-num><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LTER.1980-81232</style></accession-num></record></records></xml>