 |
LTER Cyberinfrastructure
Site Assessment Survey - Raw Analysis
This survey is designed to assess the current state,
and cyberinfrastructure (CI) needs for LTER Network level science
being developed as part of the LTER Planning Process. Components
of the survey were developed by a CI Team which met in June to
initiate the CI needs assessment. Further information can be found
in the Cyberinfrastructure section of the LTER Planning Grant
Wiki at: http://intranet.lternet.edu/planning/
This assessment covers the LTER sites only. The LTER
Network Office was assessed separately from the sites.
This survey was written and processed by John
Vande Castle, LTER Network Office, using survey tools of "Surveymonkey.com"
(This is neither an endorsement or recommendation by the LTER
Network Office). Special thanks are due to the members of
the LTER Technology Committee and LTER Information Managers who
reviewed drafts of the survey, and especially to ALL the LTER
Information managers who took the time to fill out the survey.
This survey represents a response from sites of the entire LTER
Network, again thanks to the LTER Information Managers.
This survey is meant to cover the following topic areas identified
by the LTER CI team, although some questions were added at the
request of site information managers or members of the LTER Technology
Committee:
General overview of data collection, QA/QC, archive, delivery
EML/metadata completeness
GIS/map services
Instrumentation - sensors
Remote sensing infrastructure, data storage
Analytic tools
Models
Visualization
Number of IM FTE’s – break down by type, expertise
Institutional/site support – email, admin, licensing
Network bandwidth – internal-external
Storage capacity, backup solutions
Database formats/ organization/systems
Partnerships
Server architecture
Computational capacity – models, stats, database
Collaboration tools – Wikis, vtc, email, file sharing
NOTES: Some sites entered data from multiple sessions,
as reflected in some skipped questions, but the total response
was from all 26 LTER sites.
NOTES: Some skipped questions indicate the question
doesn't apply to the site, or the site does not use or have any
of the information requested.
|
| |
| |
 |
 |
| 3.
About how many total FTE's does your site
allocate for information management from the
LTER base funding? In other words, of the
annual funding the site receives from NSF,
how many FTEs are funded from this amount.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Response
Percent |
Response
Total |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
19.2% |
5 |
|
 |
11.5% |
3 |
|
 |
23.1% |
6 |
|
 |
3.8% |
1 |
|
 |
3.8% |
1 |
|
 |
11.5% |
3 |
|
 |
11.5% |
3 |
|
 |
7.7% |
2 |
|
 |
3.8% |
1 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
|
0% |
0 |
| Total
Respondents |
25 |
| (skipped
this question) |
5 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| 4.
About how many total FTE's does your site
allocate for information management from non-
LTER base funding? In other words, about how
many FTE's are there at the site that are
not directly funded from LTER funds. This
would include cost-share, volunteers and what
have you. For example, if in an average year,
0.75 FTE worth of an IM is funded from NSF
LTER core funds, but there are really 5 FTEs
working at the site from some sort of funds
or "personal time donations" then you would
want to put "4" here (when id doubt, round
to the nearest value). |
|
|
|
 |
|
Response
Percent |
Response
Total |
|
 |
36% |
9 |
|
 |
12% |
3 |
|
 |
8% |
2 |
|
 |
8% |
2 |
|
 |
8% |
2 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
4% |
1 |
|
 |
4% |
1 |
|
 |
12% |
3 |
|
 |
8% |
2 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
| Total
Respondents |
25 |
| (skipped
this question) |
5 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| 5.
Of the site FTE's for information management,
rate from low to high, the level of expertise
in the following areas: |
|
|
|
 |
High |
Medium |
Low |
Response
Total |
| Formal
training or education in computer science. |
 |
|
8%
(2) |
46%
(12) |
46%
(12) |
26 |
| Acquired
(on the job training) computer science training. |
 |
|
46%
(12) |
50%
(13) |
4%
(1) |
26 |
| Formal
training or education in data management/database
software. |
 |
|
12%
(3) |
42%
(11) |
46%
(12) |
26 |
| Acquired
(on the job training) in data management/database
software. |
 |
|
62%
(16) |
35%
(9) |
4%
(1) |
26 |
| Formal
Ecological/Biological Science training or education. |
 |
|
73%
(19) |
23%
(6) |
4%
(1) |
26 |
| Formal
GIS/Remote Sensing training or education. |
 |
|
35%
(9) |
27%
(7) |
38%
(10) |
26 |
| Social
Science training or education. |
 |
|
0%
(0) |
19%
(5) |
81%
(21) |
26 |
| Total
Respondents |
25 |
| (skipped
this question) |
4 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| 6.
What is the GENERAL information management
task allocation at your site ? (Please have
the total allocation = 100% - the survey software
is too dumb to do this...). This question
will take some thought to answer since it
covers the effort of any and all IM FTEs at
an LTER site. It is meant to assess what type
of effort goes in to various IM "tasks" at
an LTER site. For example, if you select 50%
for General site data management, the rest
of the tasks can only add up to the remaining
50%... |
|
|
|
 |
0 |
5 |
10 |
15 |
20 |
25 |
30 |
35 |
40 |
45 |
50 |
55 |
60 |
65 |
70 |
75 |
80 |
85 |
90 |
95 |
100 |
Response
Total |
| General
site data management including data entry and
access. |
 |
|
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
15%
(4) |
8%
(2) |
4%
(1) |
12%
(3) |
19%
(5) |
0%
(0) |
4%
(1) |
0%
(0) |
19%
(5) |
0%
(0) |
12%
(3) |
4%
(1) |
4%
(1) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
26 |
| Data
archive and backup. |
 |
|
4%
(1) |
69%
(18) |
23%
(6) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
4%
(1) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
26 |
| Site
System Administration (site-based hardware and
network support). |
 |
|
4%
(1) |
23%
(6) |
46%
(12) |
8%
(2) |
4%
(1) |
12%
(3) |
4%
(1) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
26 |
| User
System Support (hardware support for site personnel. |
 |
|
15%
(4) |
54%
(14) |
23%
(6) |
0%
(0) |
8%
(2) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
26 |
| User
Support (help for site personnel such as data
retrieval, study design, statistics, etc.). |
 |
|
0%
(0) |
31%
(8) |
35%
(9) |
27%
(7) |
8%
(2) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
26 |
| Network
and cross site IM support. |
 |
|
8%
(2) |
50%
(13) |
35%
(9) |
4%
(1) |
4%
(1) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
26 |
| Software
development. |
 |
|
27%
(7) |
19%
(5) |
15%
(4) |
8%
(2) |
8%
(2) |
15%
(4) |
8%
(2) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
26 |
| Site
administrative tasks (filling out paperwork,and
doing things like answering surveys). |
 |
|
12%
(3) |
73%
(19) |
12%
(3) |
4%
(1) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
26 |
| Other
tasks. |
 |
|
29%
(5) |
35%
(6) |
18%
(3) |
18%
(3) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
0%
(0) |
17 |
| Total
Respondents |
25 |
| (skipped
this question) |
4 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| 7.
What major information management support,
and level is provided by the home/host institution(s)
of your site? Select any that apply. |
|
|
|
 |
None |
Some |
All |
Response
Average |
| Email
(use the institution's email system) |
 |
|
4%
(1) |
19%
(5) |
77%
(20) |
2.73 |
| Database
(use the institution's database system) |
 |
|
85%
(22) |
15%
(4) |
0%
(0) |
1.15 |
| Computational
Infrastructure (use the institution's computational
infrastructure for analysis, statistics, modeling,
etc.) |
 |
|
58%
(15) |
42%
(11) |
0%
(0) |
1.42 |
| System
administration is provided by the institution |
 |
|
35%
(9) |
62%
(16) |
4%
(1) |
1.69 |
| Technical
support is provided by the institution |
 |
|
19%
(5) |
77%
(20) |
4%
(1) |
1.85 |
| Institutional
(site) software licensing or educational discount |
 |
|
0%
(0) |
85%
(22) |
15%
(4) |
2.15 |
| Total
Respondents |
25 |
| (skipped
this question) |
4 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| 8.
In contrast to the direct support provided
by the home/host institution(s) of your site,
what does the site support by itself? |
|
|
|
 |
None |
Some |
All |
Response
Average |
| Email
(the site uses its own email system) |
 |
|
81%
(21) |
15%
(4) |
4%
(1) |
1.23 |
| Database
(the site uses its own database system) |
 |
|
0%
(0) |
23%
(6) |
77%
(20) |
2.77 |
| Computational
Infrastructure (use the site's computational infrastructure
for analysis, statistics, modeling, etc.) |
 |
|
4%
(1) |
46%
(12) |
50%
(13) |
2.46 |
| System
administration is handled by the site itself. |
 |
|
0%
(0) |
58%
(15) |
42%
(11) |
2.42 |
| Technical
support is handled by the site itself. |
 |
|
0%
(0) |
69%
(18) |
31%
(8) |
2.31 |
| The
site itself has arranged special software licensing
or educational discounts. |
 |
|
38%
(10) |
58%
(15) |
4%
(1) |
1.65 |
| Total
Respondents |
25 |
| (skipped
this question) |
4 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| 11.
What percentage of all site data has corresponding
structured metadata of any type, including
EML? |
|
|
|
 |
|
Response
Percent |
Response
Total |
|
 |
4% |
1 |
|
 |
4% |
1 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
4% |
1 |
|
 |
8% |
2 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
8% |
2 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
28% |
7 |
|
 |
44% |
11 |
| Total
Respondents |
25 |
| (skipped
this question) |
4 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| 12.
What percent of all site metadata has been
converted to EML to at least the "identification"
(base) level? |
|
|
|
 |
|
Response
Percent |
Response
Total |
|
 |
16% |
4 |
|
 |
8% |
2 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
4% |
1 |
|
 |
4% |
1 |
|
 |
4% |
1 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
4% |
1 |
|
 |
16% |
4 |
|
 |
8% |
2 |
|
 |
36% |
9 |
| Total
Respondents |
25 |
| (skipped
this question) |
4 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| 13.
What percent of all site metadata has been
converted to EML to the "discovery" level
or beyond? |
|
|
|
 |
|
Response
Percent |
Response
Total |
|
 |
24% |
6 |
|
 |
8% |
2 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
4% |
1 |
|
 |
4% |
1 |
|
 |
4% |
1 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
16% |
4 |
|
 |
8% |
2 |
|
 |
32% |
8 |
| Total
Respondents |
25 |
| (skipped
this question) |
4 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| 14.
What percent of all site metadata has been
converted to EML to the "integration" level
or beyond? |
|
|
|
 |
|
Response
Percent |
Response
Total |
|
 |
44% |
11 |
|
 |
8% |
2 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
4% |
1 |
|
 |
8% |
2 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
8% |
2 |
|
 |
16% |
4 |
|
 |
4% |
1 |
|
 |
8% |
2 |
| Total
Respondents |
25 |
| (skipped
this question) |
4 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| 15.
Of the known site historical/legacy data -
i.e. data the site might not consider part
of its standard research data, what percentage
has corresponding EML metadata (at any level)?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Response
Percent |
Response
Total |
|
 |
34.8% |
8 |
|
 |
13% |
3 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
|
 |
8.7% |
2 |
|
 |
4.3% |
1 |
|
 |
13% |
3 |
|
 |
8.7% |
2 |
|
 |
4.3% |
1 |
|
 |
13% |
3 |
| Total
Respondents |
23 |
| (skipped
this question) |
6 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| 26.
What type of sensor systems are routinely
used for data collection at the site (Please
describe)? |
|
|
|
 |
Total
Respondents |
|
19 |
| (skipped
this question) |
10 |
|
|
 |
|
Other:
1. Thermistor chains for water temperature profiles, ADCP, Dissolved
oxygen, meteorological measurements (air temperature, precip,
relative humidity, wind speed and direction, PAR, long and short
wave radiation)
2. Automated shipboard systems
3. Profiling instruments deployed over-the-side; ship lab flow
through systems
4. Data Loggers for meteorological data, stream and lake depth,
light, conductivity and temperature.
5. Not clear what is meant by ‘sensor system.’
6. Standard oceanographic instrument packages, ADP, ADCP, CTD,
thermistors, wave,tidal height recorders, all with internal data
recorders
7. Eddy Co-Variance Tower; Bowen ratio Tower; TDR Probes; Radiometer
8. JPL Sensor Web 3.2 -- sensor network in which all sensors are
talking to each other simultaneously. This system is being used
to monitor microclimates under three shrub species.
9. None to date
10. Automated meteorological station Eddy flux towers (3) Portable
PAR, CO2, etc stations
|
 |
 |
| 27.
Wireless internet is available for researchers
at the site. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Response
Percent |
Response
Total |
|
 |
73.9% |
17 |
|
 |
26.1% |
6 |
| Total
Respondents |
23 |
| (skipped
this question) |
6 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| 28.
The site has installed wireless internet
for automated data collection at the
site (this would include radio data
transmission that is eventually linked
directly to the internet). An example
is the wireless network that was installed
at the VCR LTER site. If, so please
BRIEFLY append a description to question
#34 |
|
|
|
 |
|
Response
Percent |
Response
Total |
|
 |
41.7% |
10 |
|
 |
54.2% |
13 |
| |
|
If present,
please describe in "other" of question #34 |
|
 |
| |
| Total
Respondents |
24 |
| (skipped
this question) |
5 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| 31.
What is the primary link speed from the Home
Institution(s) to the Internet? In other words,
what kind of Internet connection does your
primary site institution, university etc.
have? For multiple institution sites, select
what most have, or what the primary site institution
has. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Response
Percent |
Response
Total |
| |
|
Internet
link is greater than 1 GB/s |
|
 |
28% |
7 |
|
 |
32% |
8 |
|
 |
32% |
8 |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
| |
|
Internet
link is less than 10mb/s |
|
 |
8% |
2 |
| |
|
There is
no internet connection. |
|
 |
0% |
0 |
| Total
Respondents |
25 |
| (skipped
this question) |
4 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| 32.
What is the primary Internet Link at the Research
SITE ? |
|
|
|
 |
|
Response
Percent |
Response
Total |
| |
|
Internet
link is greater than 1 GB/s. |
|
 |
4.2% |
1 |
|
 |
8.3% |
2 |
|
 |
20.8% |
5 |
|
 |
20.8% |
5 |
| |
|
Internet
link is less than 10mb/s |
|
 |
41.7% |
10 |
| |
|
There is
no internet connection. |
|
 |
4.2% |
1 |
| Total
Respondents |
24 |
| (skipped
this question) |
5 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| 35.
What type of conferencing capability is available
at the site's home institution(s)? Select
all that apply. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Response
Percent |
Response
Total |
 |
|
Local
(on-site) phone conferencing is available. |
|
 |
100% |
25 |
 |
|
Shared
phone conferencing capabilities are available
at the institution. |
|
 |
68% |
17 |
 |
|
Local
or shared ISDN video teleconferencing. |
|
 |
32% |
8 |
 |
|
Voice
over Internet (such as Skype). |
|
 |
36% |
9 |
 |
|
Local
internet video conferencing (such as Polycom video). |
|
 |
52% |
13 |
 |
|
Shared
internet video conferencing (such as Polycom video)
is available at the institution. |
|
 |
36% |
9 |
 |
|
Local
satellite video conferencing. |
|
 |
8% |
2 |
 |
|
Shared
satellite video conferencing is available at the
institution. |
|
 |
16% |
4 |
 |
|
Local
advanced video conferencing (such as ACCESS Grid)
is available i.e. the site has direct access or
maintains an ACCESS Grid system. |
|
|
0% |
0 |
 |
|
Shared
advance video conferencing (such as ACCESS Grid)
is available somewhere at the institution. |
|
 |
4% |
1 |
 |
|
Other
(please describe) |
|
|
0% |
0 |
| Total
Respondents |
25 |
| (skipped
this question) |
4 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
| 37.
What type of computational capabilities does
your site provide to researchers for data
analysis - modeling, statistical analysis
and data synthesis? Select all that apply. |
|
|
|
 |
|
Response
Percent |
Response
Total |
 |
|
Investigators
use their personal systems for analysis. |
|
 |
92% |
23 |
 |
|
The
university/home institution provides most computational
support for data analysis. |
|
 |
36% |
9 |
 |
|
A
dedicated system is supported by the site for
data analysis. |
|
 |
24% |
6 |
 |
|
A
local computer cluster is available to researchers
for data analysis. |
|
 |
20% |
5 |
 |
|
A
remote computer cluster is available to researchers
for data analysis. |
|
 |
8% |
2 |
 |
|
A
direct link to high performance computer center
is available to researchers for data analysis. |
|
 |
8% |
2 |
 |
|
Other
(please describe) |
|
|
0% |
0 |
| Total
Respondents |
25 |
| (skipped
this question) |
4 |
|
|
 |
|
| |
 |
 |
| 41.
Does your site currently use web services
? |
|
|
|
 |
|
Response
Percent |
Response
Total |
|
 |
32% |
8 |
|
 |
68% |
17 |
| Total
Respondents |
25 |
| (skipped
this question) |
4 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |